A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal web-site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier as well as Irish Occasions write-up about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a local disagreement has developed into a extremely publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a corporation director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven citizens. According to the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted less than arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are subject to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in a very delicate coastal surroundings for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-high drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has because become emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the water all through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately by the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read further submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant from the authorized timeline.
With the core in the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and ailments connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental security and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public look at, insisting alternatively that it is about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing relationship to the world and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair just endeavoring to produce a loved ones home in accordance with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Exclusive Location of Conservation and say that every one works are already performed depending on Experienced suggestions and authorized designs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal web site is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea ranges rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now a lot more contentious.
The Irish Instances post about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been associated with nearby advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from pretty diverse professional backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth from the coastline as well as the symbolic character with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme strategy.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays uncertain. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as created complies with setting up authorization and whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and setting up ailments. Still the human component continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside alongside one another extended after the authorized charges have already been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental defense and property rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Probably the most closely watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.